Every Monday, I share some of what I’ve been reading in the past week.
Yet another example of how language matters: using person-centered language to talk about addiction improves treatment and policy: “clinicians — from the least educated up through doctoral-level professionals — take a more punitive stance when patients are described as ‘substance abusers’ rather than ‘people with substance use disorder.'”
Southern Baptists have published a new gender-inclusive Bible translation.
Chris Christie gave a half-hearted defense of Trump’s comments to James Comey as “normal New York City conversation.” As a New Yorker and a linguist, I’m flummoxed by what he meant — and I’m not the only one. (I’m also fascinated by the language ideologies on display in these person-on-the-street takes on “normal NYC conversation.”)
Taking on bad linguistics journalism! (And I must admit I’m happy to be part of one of the examples of doing it right.)
Last week, Kamala Harris was interrupted … for doing her job. Here’s a reminder about women’s role in public discourse: “Tali Mendelberg, professor of politics at Princeton University, … and Christopher F. Karpowitz, associate professor of political science at Brigham Young University, found that, at school board meetings, men and women did not speak as long until women made up 80 percent of the school board. When men were in the minority, however, they did not speak up less.”
“We love stories about dying languages and their last speakers for the same reasons that we love stories about the last buffalo, the last passenger pigeon, or the last cowboy: They confirm an evolutionary story we tell ourselves about what’s fit for the modern world. Sure, we might seem to be mourning the passing of these worlds gone by, but the eulogies implicitly tell a social Darwinist story in which minority languages succumb to modernity because they’re unsuited for the times.” — Michael Erard